I really should call this paper &qu...

I really should call this paper "Reading David Parker reading critics reading Kathryn Harrison's The Kiss." The paper is in brace parts. There is a central section about for what reason I read The Kiss in relation to certain critics, about of them sympathetic and a certain quantity of unsympathetic to the memoir. The peace of the paper is a sort of metadiscursive frame that focuses forward the question of why I read it in that way, and with what intent I agree with some critics and disagree with others. In this section I engage explicitly with questions of counter-transference in reading, and the interpretation of